Writ petition disposed of in terms of an earlier order dated 04.04.2025 in CWP-9556-2025, as counsel stated the issue was covered by that verdict.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
131
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CWP-13705-2025
Date of Decision : 14.05.2025
RAJ KUMAR AND OTHERS .....Petitioners
VERSUS
THE UNION TERRITORY, CHANDIGARH .....Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KULDEEP TIWARI
Present : Mr. Vikas Chatrath, Advocate, for the petitioners.
Mr. Jaivir S.Chandail, Addl.Standing Counsel and Ms. Shubreet Kaur, Jr. Standing Counsel, for the respondent UT, Chandigarh.
KULDEEP TIWARI, J.(Oral)
(KULDEEP TIWARI) May 14, 2025 JUDGE dharamvir Whether speaking/reasoned. : Yes/No Whether Reportable. : Yes/No
DHARAM VIR 2025.05.16 18:37 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Raj Kumar and Others
The Union Territory, Chandigarh
Kuldeep Tiwari
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
