Rahul v. State of Haryana and Another
Case brief
What is this about?
Extraction not possible: the supplied judgment text is corrupted throughout (broken font/character encoding rendering substantive paragraphs, headings, dates, citations and quoted passages unreadable). The only character-for-character verifiable strings are the recurring attestation watermark 'PRINCE CHAWLA 2025.10.31 16:31 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document' (paras 17, 27, 35, 41, 51) and the standalone name 'Prince Chawla' (para 49), whose capacity (party, counsel or attesting deponent) cannot be determined from the text. All structured fields are therefore null/empty pending a clean copy.
����� ���������������������������������������� ��������������