Dismissed¶33

The Managing Director Punjab State Co. Op Supply v. Shiv Kumar and Others

Punjab & Haryana HC13 Nov 2025CWP/11787/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Dismissed as withdrawn; gratuity for extended period; Punjab State Co-op Supply; Punjab State Cooperative Supply and Marketing Federation Ltd. Markfed; CWP-11787-2025 (O&M); CWP-19241-2025; CWP-35002-2024 (decided 10.01.2025); LPA-1089-2025; CWP-32362-2024; liberty to seek fresh order upon success before Supreme Court; withdrawal of writ petitions; Kuldeep Tiwari, J.; High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh.

What did the court decide?

Liberty to the petitioners to seek a fresh order in the event of success in their challenge to the LPA judgment before the Hon'ble Supreme Court; pending applications disposed of accordingly. ¶33

The Managing Director Punjab State Co. Op Supply Vs Shiv Kumar and Others — Punjab & Haryana HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

¶2

115 (I) CWP-11787-2025 (O&M) Date of Decision : November 13, 2025

¶3

THE MANAGING DIRECTOR PUNJAB STATE CO OP SUPPLY

¶4

-PETITIONER

¶5

V/S

¶6

SHIV KUMAR AND OTHERS

¶7

-RESPONDENTS

¶8

(II) CWP-19241-2025

¶9

PUNJAB STATE COOPERATIVE SUPPLY AND MARKETING FEDERATION LTD. MARKFED

¶10

-PETITIONER

¶11

V/S

¶12

PARMAL SINGH AND OTHERS

¶13

-RESPONDENTS

¶14

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KULDEEP TIWARI

¶15

Present: Mr. Vinod Polist, Advocate for the petitioner(s).

¶16

Mr. Shiv Kumar, Advocate, and Mr. Lovedev Singh, Advocate, and Mr. Raman Kaplish, Advocate for the respondent No.1.

¶17

¶18

KULDEEP TIWARI, J. (ORAL)

¶19

On the previous date of hearing, i.e. 12.11.2025, this Court

¶20

passed the following order:-

¶21

“The issue involved for consideration in these writ petitions, was also raised in CWP-32362-2024, wherein, it was fairly conceded by learned counsel for the petitioner that the controversy has already been put to rest by a Coordinate Bench of this Court in CWP-35002-2024, decided on 10.01.2025. Further, the decision (supra) has also been upheld in LPA 10892025, and connected matters, vide which, the respondentsemployees therein, have been held entitled to gratuity for the extended period, as well.

¶22

DEVINDER YADAV 2025.11.14 09:50 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment

¶23

CWP-11787-2025 (O&M) & CWP-19241-2025

¶24

¶25

Faced with the above, learned counsel for the petitioners seeks a short accommodation to have apt instructions, as to whether, the petitioners is still willing to purse the instant writ petitions.

¶26

The asked for request is accepted.

¶27

Adjourned to 13.11.2025.

¶28

To be shown in the urgent list.

¶29

It is made clear that, on the subsequent date of hearing, no request for adjournment would be entertained on behalf of either side.

¶30

A photocopy of this order be placed on the file of connected case.”

¶31

Today, learned counsel for the petitioner(s) fairly concedes that

¶32

the issue inhering these writ petitions stands squarely covered by the ratio laid down by a Co-ordinate Bench of this Court in CWP-35002-2024 , as affirmed by the Division Bench in LPA-1089-2025 . He further submits that the petitioner(s) is in the process of assailing the judgment rendered in the LPA ( supra ) before the Hon’ble Supreme Court. Accordingly, he prays for permission to withdraw these writ petitions, with liberty to pass fresh order in the event of success in their challenge before the Hon’ble Supreme Court.

¶33

Consequently, these writ petitions are dismissed as withdrawn , with liberty ( supra ).

¶34

Pending application(s) stand disposed of accordingly.

¶35

A photocopy of this order be placed on file of connected case.

¶36

		(KU	LDEEP TIWARI)
November	13, 2025		JUDGE
devinder
	Whether speaking/reasoned	:	Yes/No
	Whether Reportable	:	Yes/No

¶37

DEVINDER YADAV 2025.11.14 09:50 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment

The Managing Director Punjab State Co. Op Supply v. Shiv Kumar and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

The Managing Director Punjab State Co. Op Supply v. Shiv Kumar and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sukhmanpreet Singh Cheema and Others Vs Union of India and Others

Hemant Sharma Vs State Information Commission Haryana and Ors.

Mangal Singh and Others Vs State of Punjab and Others

Sonu and Ors. Vs State of Haryana and Others

Dainik Bhaskar Corporation Ltd. Vs Presiding Officer Industrialtribunal Cum Labour Court Ut Chandigarh and Another

Reciever, Swami Uma Bharti Public School and Anr. Vs State Information Commission, Haryana and Others