Deepak Sharma v. the State of Haryana and Others
Case brief
What is this about?
High Court Chandigarh; writ petition disposed of (attestation dated 08.05.2025); denial of 'no-confidence' motion by State counsel on instructions of BDPO Israna (Rajesh Sharma), District Panipat; statements in Annexures P-4, P-6, P-9 held baseless; complaint against petitioner pending before concerned authority; inquiry marked to Sub Divisional Magistrate, Israna; complaints dated 15.04.2025 (Annexures P-7, P-8); respondents No.2, 3 and No.8-16; counsel Satyaveer Singh; no further orders passed; panchayat/no-confidence dispute, Panipat.
What did the court decide?
Keeping in view the submissions made by learned State counsel and learned counsel for respondents No.8 to 16, no further orders are required to be passed in the instant writ petition, and the petition is accordingly disposed of. ¶5