Punjab & Haryana High Court; CWP-11387-2024 (O&M); Civil Writ Petition; dismissed as not pressed; settlement inter se parties; withdrawal of execution of Tribunal judgment; caveator respondent No.1; Aman Chaudhary, J.; decision dated 10.07.2025; oral order; no ratio laid down.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
113
CWP-11387-2024 (O&M) Date of decision: 10.07.2025
S.D.P. College for Women and Another
....Petitioners
Versus
Mrs. Monika Mittal and Others
...Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY
Present : Mr. Arjun Partap Atma Ram and Mr. Sandeep Kumar, Advocates for the petitioners
Mr. Keshav Gupta, Advocate for respondent No.1-Caveator
Mr. Shubham Thakur, Advocate for respondent No.2
AMAN CHAUDHARY, J. (ORAL)
1 . Learned counsel based on instructions received from respondent No.1, who is present in Court, states that the matter stands settled inter se parties and would therefore, not pursue/withdraw the execution of the judgment of the learned Tribunal, in view of which, learned counsel for the petitioners does not press the petition any further.
2 . Dismissed as not pressed.
(AMAN CHAUDHARY)
JUDGE
10.07.2025 M.Kamra
Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes / No Whether reportable : Yes / No
MOHIT 2025.07.10 19:26 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
How this case reached the court
Judgment of the learned Tribunal, execution of which respondent No.1 agreed not to pursue/withdraw upon settlement of the matter inter se the parties¶16
Learned Tribunal (identity not specified in the text)
Counsel for respondent No.1, on instructions received from respondent No.1 who was present in Court, stated that the matter stands settled inter se parties and that execution of the learned Tribunal's judgment would not be pursued/withdrawn; in view of this, counsel for the petitioners did not press the petition any further.¶16
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
