Disposed¶21

Jagtar Singh v. State of Punjab and Others

Punjab & Haryana HC13 Jan 2025CRWP/242/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Parole representation pending before Deputy Commissioner-cum-District Magistrate, Jalandhar; writ under Articles 226/227 seeking expeditious disposal within a reasonable time per Varun @ Gullu (CRM-M-34013-2009, DB, 26.04.2010); convict of FIR No.7/2006, Sections 489-A/489-B/489-C/489-D/420 IPC, PS Phillaur, 7 years RI; appeal CRA-S-2787-SB-2010 dismissed 23.01.2014; direction to decide Annexure P-3 within two weeks; Punjab & Haryana High Court; Rajesh Bhardwaj, J.; CRWP-242-2025; decided 13.01.2025.

What did the court decide?

Direction to respondent No.2 (Deputy Commissioner-cum-District Magistrate, District Jalandhar) to decide the petitioner's representation (Annexure P-3) within a period of two weeks in accordance with law. ¶21

Jagtar Singh Vs State of Punjab and Others — Writ and Judicial Review | Punjab & Haryana HC (2025)

CRWP-242-2025

-1-

110

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

¶5

CRWP-242-2025 Date of Decision: January 13, 2025

Jagtar Singh

......Petitioner

Versus

State of Punjab and others

¶10

......Respondents

¶11

CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAJESH BHARDWAJ

¶12

Present: Mr.Prateek Pandit,Advocate for the petitioners.

¶13

RAJESH BHARDWAJ, J.(ORAL)

¶14

Present petition has been filed under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India for directing respondent No.2, i.e. Deputy Commissioner-cum-District Magistrate, Jalandhar, to decide the parole case of the petitioner expeditously and within a reasonable period of time in view of the law laid down by a Division Bench of this Court in Varun @ Gullu vs State of Haryana and others passed in CRM-M-34013-2009 on 26.04.2010.

¶15

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been convicted in FIR No.7, dated 08.01.2006 under Sections 489-A, 489-B, 489-C, 489-D, and 420 IPC, registered at Police Station Phillaur, vide judgment dated 01.10.2010 and sentenced to undergo RI for a period of 7 years by learned Additional Sessions Judge Jalandhar. Appeal filed by the petitioner, i.e CRA-S-2787-SB-2010, has already been dismissed by this Hon’ble Court vide order dated 23.01.2014. It is submitted that the

¶16

MEENU 2025.01.14 14:42 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

¶17

CRWP-242-2025 -2-

¶18

petitioner applied for grant of parole to the Jail Superintendent, Central Jail, Kapurthala, on 30.08.2024, which was forwarded to respondent No.2, i.e. Deputy Commissioner-cum-District Magistrate, District Jalandhar, vide letter dated 03.09.2024, but the same has not been decided till date.

¶19

Notice of motion to respondents.

¶20

On the asking of the Court, Mr.Tarun Aggarwal, Sr.DAG, Punjab, who is present in Court, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents/State.

¶21

After hearing learned counsel for the parties and going through the facts and circumstances of the case, the present petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.2, i.e. Deputy Commissioner-cum-District Magistrate, District Jalandhar, to decide the representation (Annexure P-3) of the petitioner within a period of two weeks from today in accordance with law.

¶22

January 13, 2025	( RAJESH BHARDWAJ )
meenuss	JUDGE
1. Whether speaking/reasoned ?	Yes/No
2. Whether reportable ?	Yes/No

¶23

MEENU 2025.01.14 14:42 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

Jagtar Singh v. State of Punjab and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Jagtar Singh v. State of Punjab and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Meenakshi Khetarpal and Another Vs State of Haryana and Another

Pushpa and Others Vs Union Territory, Chandigarh and Others

Harjit Singh Vs State of Punjab

Manoj Kumar Vs State of Punjab

Narinder Kaur and Anr. Vs State of Haryana and Ors.

Jyoti and Anr. Vs State of Punjab and Ors.