Disposed¶16

Anil Kumar and Anr. v. State of Haryana & Ors.

Punjab & Haryana HC19 Dec 2025CRM-A/951/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Anil Kumar and Anr v. State of Haryana; CRM-A-951-MA-2018 (O&M); CRM-16877-2018 delay condonation; appeal against acquittal dated 28.11.2017; leave to appeal granted; appeal admitted; personal bond Rs. 25,000 and surety Rs. 25,000; Anoop Chitkara J.; decided 19.12.2025; High Court Chandigarh.

What did the court decide?

Delay of 19 days condoned; leave to appeal granted; main case admitted. Accused-respondents No.2 to 4 directed to furnish personal bond of Rs. 25,000 with one surety of Rs. 25,000, undertaking to appear before the High Court in case the appeal is allowed; Registry to communicate the order to the trial Court. ¶16

Anil Kumar and Anr. Vs State of Haryana & Ors. — Punjab & Haryana HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

205 CRM-A-951-MA-2018 (O&M)

¶2

ANIL KUMAR AND ANR V/S STATE OF HARYANA

¶3

Present: Mr. Himanshu Garg, Advocate for the appellants.

¶4

Mr. Atul Gaur, A.A.G., Haryana.

¶5

Mr. Sandeep Vashisth, Advocate for respondents No.2 to 4.

¶6

¶7

CRM-16877-2018

¶8

For the reasons men�oned in the applica�on, delay of 19 days in filing the appeal is condoned.

¶9

Applica�on stands allowed.

¶10

CRM-A-951-MA-2018

¶11

Counsel for the appellants submits that the appellants have a very good case on merit and there is sufficient evidence on record which is sufficient for convic�on of respondents No.2 to 4. There is no apprecia�on of evidence in judgment of acqui�al dated 28.11.2017.

¶12

Counsel for respondents No.2 to 4 opposes the prayer. Leave to appeal granted.

Main case

Heard

Admi�ed.

The accused i.e. respondents No.2 to 4 to execute a bond for a�endance within three months, undertaking to appear in this Court, in case appeal is allowed.

¶17

Given above, the accused-respondents No.2 to 4 shall furnish a personal bond of Rs. Twenty Five Thousand only (INR 25,000/-), and furnishing one surety for Rs. Twenty-Five thousand only (INR 25,000/-), to the sa�sfac�on of the concerned Trial Court/Duty Magistrate. Before accep�ng the sure�es, the concerned Court must sa�sfy that if the accused fails to appear in Court, then such surety is capable of producing the pe��oner before the Court.

¶18

The furnishing of the personal bonds shall be deemed acceptance of the all s�pula�ons, terms, and condi�ons of this bail order.

¶19

Registry to communicate this order to the trial Court without any delay. In case of failure of respondents No.2 to 4 to furnish bond, the concerned Court shall proceed further in accordance with law.

¶20

There would be no need for a cer�fied copy of this order for furnishing bonds, and any Advocate for the accused can download this order along with case status from the official web page of this Court and a�est it to be a true copy. In case the a�es�ng officer wants to verify the authen�city, such an officer can also verify its authen�city and may download and use the downloaded copy for a�es�ng bonds.

¶21

(ANOOP CHITKARA) JUDGE

¶22

19.12.2025 Jyo� Sharma

¶23

JYOTI SHARMA 2025.12.19 16:37 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment High Court, Sector 1, Chandigarh

Anil Kumar and Anr. v. State of Haryana & Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Anil Kumar and Anr. v. State of Haryana & Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Jassa Singh and Ors. Vs State of Punjab

Satyen Srivastava Vs State of Haryana and Another

Satyen Srivastava Vs State of Haryana and Another

Braham Singh @ Neetu Vs State of Haryana and Others

Sushil Vs State of Haryana

Gurpreet Singh Alias Gopi etc. Vs State of Punjab