Petitioner sought regular bail in an NDPS Act FIR registered at Amritsar under Section 483 BNSS. Counsel sought withdrawal of the petition, and the High Court disposed of it as withdrawn without deciding the bail question.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
274-1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRM-M-3909-2025 Date of decision: 10.03.2025
RAJESH KAPOOR @ BITTA
...PETITIONER
VERSUS
STATE OF PUNJAB
...RESPONDENT
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANOOP CHITKARA
Present: Mr. B.S.Bhalla, Advocate for the pe��oner.
Mr. Akshay Kumar, Asst. AG, Punjab.
****
ANOOP CHITKARA, J. (ORAL)
| Pe22on for Regular Bail und | er Sec2on 483 BNSS | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| FIR No. | Dated | Police Sta�on | Sec�ons |
| 53 | 07.09.2024 | 'D' Division, District | 22 and 29 of the |
| Amritsar | NDPS Act |
before this Court under Sec�on 483 of Bhara�ya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, [BNSS).
10.03.2025
( ANOOP CHITKARA)
renubala JUDGE
Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether reportable: Yes/No
Renu Bala 2025.03.12 09:45 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Rajesh Kapoor @ Bitta
State of Punjab
Anoop Chitkara
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
