Dismissed¶16

Nawab Alias Firoz v. State of Punjab

Punjab & Haryana HC3 Dec 2025CRM-M/38491/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

CRM-M-38491-2025, High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh, decided 03.12.2025 by Justice Sanjay Vashisth (oral). Petitioner Nawab alias Firoz sought regular bail under Section 483 BNSS 2023 (earlier Section 439 Cr.P.C.) in FIR No.223 dated 06.10.2023, Section 377 IPC, Police Station City Rupnagar, District Rupnagar. State counsel (DAG Sukhbeer Singh, assisted by ASI Subash Chander) stated the trial had ended in acquittal vide judgment dated 15.09.2025; petition dismissed as infructuous. Keywords: bail infructuous, acquittal, BNSS 483, CrPC 439, IPC 377, Rupnagar.

What did the court decide?

On the statement of learned State counsel that the petitioner had already been acquitted in the trial vide judgment dated 15.09.2025, the petition having been rendered infructuous was dismissed. ¶16

Nawab Alias Firoz Vs State of Punjab — Bail and Remand | Punjab & Haryana HC (2025)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

¶2

229

¶3

CRM-M-38491-2025 Decided on : 03.12.2025

Nawab alias Firoz

. . . Petitioner(s)

Versus

State of Punjab . . . Respondent(s)

¶8

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY VASHISTH

¶9

PRESENT: None for the petitioner(s).

¶10

Mr. Sukhbeer Singh, DAG, Punjab assisted by ASI Subash Chander.

¶11

¶12

SANJAY VASHISTH, J. (Oral)

¶13

The instant petition has been filed under Section 483 of BNSS, 2023 (earlier Section 439 Cr.P.C.), for grant of regular bail to the petitioner, during the pendency of trial, who has been booked in a criminal case arising out of First Information Report, as detailed here-under:-

¶14

Name of	FIR	Date	Section(s)	Police Station	District
Petitioner(s)	No.
Sandeep Kumar	223	06.10.2023	377 of IPC	City Rupnagar	Rupnagar

¶15

At the outset, learned State counsel informs that present petition has been rendered infructuous, on account of the final decision of the trial, wherein, petitioner has already been acquitted vide judgment dated 15.09.2025, therefore, same may be disposed of accordingly.

¶16