Raj Kumar v. Tarvinder Kumar Ahuja

What is this about?

Source text is severely corrupted (encoding/mojibake damage): paragraphs 1-17 and 20-24 contain no machine-readable substrings. The only verbatim-recoverable content is the certifying officer's attestation stamp naming the court as High Court, Chandigarh (paras 18 and 25) and bare page-number markers (paras 19, 26). No case number, bench, parties, advocates, statutes, cited precedents, issues, holdings, or outcome could be verified against the text, so all such fields are left empty/null rather than guessed. Re-extraction from a clean copy of the judgment is required before this record can be used for citation decisions.