Vaishali Vs State of Punjab

3. Referring to the reply submitted by the State, learned State counsel as well as learned counsel representing the complainant have submitted that the complainant had paid Rs.15,000/- to the petitioner through google pay as per the account statement annexed with the reply.

¶27

4. Be it the case, without commenting on the merits, the petitioner is directed to join the investigation within seven days from today and in the event of his arrest, he is ordered to be released on interim bail on his furnishing personal/surety bonds to the satisfaction of the Arresting Officer/Investigating Officer. He shall also abide by conditions as envisaged under Section 482(2) of BNSS, 2023.

¶28

5. List on 20.05.2025.

¶29

6. Investigating Officer of the case to remain present in Court along with record on that date.”

¶30

Learned State counsel on instructions received from ASI Darshan Singh informs the Court that the petitioner has joined the investigation and is neither required for further investigation nor for any custodial interrogation.

¶31

Keeping in view the above submissions made by learned State counsel and the fact that the petitioner had joined the investigation consequent to the order dated 29.04.2025 passed by this Court, interim bail granted vide order dated 29.04.2025 is hereby confirmed, subject to conditions as envisaged under Section 482(2) of BNSS. Further the Puneet Sharma 2025.05.22 17:28 petitioner is directed to join investigation as and when required in future by I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment

¶32

210 CRM-M-3528-2025 -3-

¶33

way of written notice for such purpose to be served by Investigating Officer of this case upon the petitioner; she will not tamper with the evidence nor will influence the witnesses and will not leave the country without prior permission of the Court.

¶34

The petition stands allowed.

¶35

It is made clear that anything contained hereinabove shall not

¶36

be construed to be an expression of opinion on the merits of the case.

¶37

		(SANJIV BERRY)
20.05.2025		JUDGE
puneet
i)	Whether speaking/reasoned?	Yes/No
ii)	Whether reportable?	Yes/No

¶38

Puneet Sharma 2025.05.22 17:28 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment

Vaishali v. State of Punjab

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Vaishali v. State of Punjab

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sunil Vs State of Haryana

Bunty @ Banti Vs State of Haryana

Imran Khan Vs State of Haryana

Jatinder Kumar Alias Sahil Alias Gujjar Vs State of Punjab

Harbeer Singh and Anr. Vs State of Punjab and Another

Sanjay Vs State of Haryana