Sanjeev Kumar @ Sonu and Others Vs State of Punjab and Another

The present petition has been filed under Section 528 BNSS for quashing of DDR No.20 dated 12.08.2023 under Section 323, 324, 341, 506 and 34 IPC, 1860, registered at Police Station City Balachaur, District SBS Nagar, Annexure P-1, cross case FIR No. 43 under Section 323, 341 IPC registered at Police Station City Balachaur, District SBS Nagar, Punjab, on the basis of compromise, Annexure P-3.

¶15

Vide order dated 08.04.2025, parties were directed to appear before the Illaqa Magistrate/Trial Court and report with regard to the genuineness of the compromise was called for.

¶16

The report dated 30.04.2025 has been received from Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Balachaur, stating that the parties have entered into a

¶17

MEENU 2025.05.29 15:11 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

¶18

CRM-M-19111-2025

¶19

-2-

¶20

compromise, which is genuine, voluntary and without any coercion or undue influence.

¶21

Full Bench of this Court in Kulwinder Singh and others vs. State of

¶22

Punjab, 2007 (3) RCR (Criminal) 1052 , has held:-

¶23

“ The only inevitable conclusion from the above discussion is that there is no statutory bar under the Cr.P.C. which can affect the inherent power of this Court under Section 482. Further, the same cannot be limited to matrimonial cases alone and the Court has the wide power to quash the proceedings even in noncompoundable offences notwithstanding the bar under Section 320 of the Cr.P.C., in order to prevent the abuse of law and to secure the ends of justice.

¶24

The power under Section 482 of the Cr.P.C. is to be exercised Ex-Debitia Justitia to prevent an abuse of process of Court. There can neither be an exhaustive list nor the defined parameters to enable a High Court to invoke or exercise its inherent powers. It will always depend upon the facts and circumstances of each case. The power under Section 482 of the Cr.P.C. has no limits. However, the High Court will exercise it sparingly and with utmost care and caution. The exercise of power has to be with circumspection and restraint. The Court is a vital and an extra-ordinary effective instrument to maintain and control social order. The Courts play role of paramount importance in achieving peace, harmony and ever- lasting congeniality in society. Resolution of a dispute by way of a compromise between two warring groups, therefore, should attract the immediate and prompt attention of a Court which should endeavour to give full effect to the same unless such compromise is abhorrent to lawful composition of the society or would promote savagery.”

¶25

MEENU 2025.05.29 15:11 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

¶26

CRM-M-19111-2025

¶27

-3-

¶28

The legal principles as laid down for quashing of the judgment were also approved by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the matter of ' Gian Singh Versus State of Punjab and another, ( 2012) 10 SCC 303' . Furthermore, the broad principles for exercising the powers under Section 482 (now Section 528 of BNSS) were summarized by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the matter of ' Parbatbhai Aahir @ Parbatbhai Bhimsinhbhai Karmur and others versus State of Gujarat and another” (2017) 9 SCC 641'.

¶29

It is evident that in view of the amicable resolution of the issues amongst the parties, no useful purpose would be served by continuation of the proceedings. The furtherance of the proceedings is likely to be a waste of judicial time and there appears to be no chances of conviction.

¶30

In view of above, DDR No.20 dated 12.08.2023 under Section 323, 324, 341, 506 and 34 IPC, 1860, registered at Police Station City Balachaur, District SBS Nagar, Annexure P-1, cross case FIR No. 43 under Section 323, 341 IPC registered at Police Station City Balachaur, District SBS Nagar, Punjab, is quashed qua the petitioners, on the basis of compromise dated 05.03.2025 (Annexure P-3).

¶31

The present petition is hereby allowed.

¶32

27.05.2025

¶33

(SANDEEP MOUDGIL) JUDGE

¶34

Meenu

¶35

Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No

¶36

MEENU 2025.05.29 15:11 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

Sanjeev Kumar @ Sonu and Others v. State of Punjab and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sanjeev Kumar @ Sonu and Others v. State of Punjab and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Jaswinder Singh Gurna and Another Vs State of Punjab and Another

Manjit Singh and Anr. Vs State of Punjab and Anr.

Shabana and Another Vs State of Haryana and Others

Pardeep Alias Jhola and Others Vs State of Haryana and Others

Om Parkash Vs Kul Bahadur

Jaswinderjit Singh & Others Vs State of Punjab and Others