Disposed¶22

Jatinder Kaur v. Ut of Chandigarh and Others

Punjab & Haryana HC2 Sept 2025CRM-M/16955/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

CRM-M-16955-2025; Section 528 BNSS; transfer of investigation to other investigating agency; UT Chandigarh police; Look Out Circular for respondents abroad; investigation complete; Final Report within three weeks; no malice or collusion by investigating officer; Jatinder Kaur v. Union Territory Chandigarh and others; Vinod S. Bhardwaj, J.; disposed 02.09.2025.

What did the court decide?

Respondent-State held bound by its statement to submit the Final Report within three weeks from receipt of certified copy of this order; no transfer of investigation ordered. ¶22

Jatinder Kaur Vs Ut of Chandigarh and Others — Punjab & Haryana HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

¶2

CRM-M-16955-2025

¶3

248 IN THE PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH

¶4

CRM-M-16955-2025 Decided on:02.09.2025

Jatinder Kaur

.... Petitioner

versus

Union Territory Chandigarh and others

¶9

.... Respondents

¶10

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD S. BHARDWAJ

¶11

Present: Mr. R.S.Mamli, Advocate for the petitioner.

¶12

Mr. Alankrit Bhardwaj, Addl. PP for respondents No.1 to 5.

¶13

¶14

Vinod S. Bhardwaj, J.(Oral)

¶15

Present petition has been filed under Section 528 of BNSS for directing the official respondents to take legal action against private respondents and to carry out investigation in proper manner or to hand over the investigation to some other agency.

¶16

Status report by way of an affidavit of Udaypal Singh, SDPO, Deputy Superintendent of Police, Police Station Sector 3, Chandigarh filed on behalf of respondents No.1 to 5, is taken on record subject to all just exceptions. As per the reply filed, respondents No.6 and 7 are abroad and a Look Out Circular for the said respondents, who are the kingpin, have already been issued. Investigation of the case is complete, and Final Report shall be positively filed within three weeks from today.

¶17

Having heard learned counsel for the parties and on going through the documents appended alongwith the petition, it is evident that there are no compelling reasons for transferring the investigation to some

¶18

SONIA BURA 2025.09.04 10:31 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

¶19

¶20

CRM-M-16955-2025

¶21

other investigating agency as there is no attribution of malice against the investigating officer or there being any collusion with the suspects.

¶22

Present petition is accordingly disposed of warranting no further orders. The respondent-State shall however, remain bound by their statement and submit the Final Report within a period of three weeks from receipt of certified copy of this order.

¶23

02.09.2025 sonia

¶24

(VINOD S. BHARDWAJ) JUDGE

¶25

Whether speaking/reasoned? Yes/No Whether reportable? Yes/No

¶26

SONIA BURA 2025.09.04 10:31 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

Jatinder Kaur v. Ut of Chandigarh and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Jatinder Kaur v. Ut of Chandigarh and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Gurpreet Kaur Vs Sukhwinder Singh

Veer Anand Mor and Anr. Vs State of Haryana and Others

Karnail Singh Vs Karnail Singh

Parveen Kumar Vs State of Punjab and Another

Rajkumar Vs State of Haryana and Another

Kirorimal Vs Shree Sheo Narayan Godara Traders Firm & Others