Rupa Singh Vs State of Punjab

The petitioner incarcerated in the FIR captioned above had come up before this Court under Section 483 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, [BNSS], seeking regular bail.

¶17

As per paragraph 15 of the bail petition as well as custody certificate dated 08.04.2025, the accused has the following criminal antecedents:

¶18

Sr. No.	FIR No.	Date	Offenses	Police Station
1	10	18.03.2021	21/27-A/25/29 of NDPS Act	SSOC (State Operation Amritsar	Special Cell),

¶19

The facts and allegations are being taken from the reply filed by the State, which reads as follows:

¶20

“4. That it is submitted that the present case FIR No. 17 dated 21.1.2025, under Section 25/54/59 Arms Act, Police Station Gharinda, Amritsar Rural was registered on the basis of secret information received by ASI Joginder Singh, CIA Staff, Amritsar Rural that Bikram Singh @ Bikram S/o Harjinder Singh R/o Village Bhuse, PS Sarai Amanat Khan, District Tarn Taran receives arms through drone from Pakistan and further supplies the same. He having red colour bag in his hand, was standing on

¶21

ANJU RANI 2025.04.23 14:39 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Punjab and Haryana High Court Chandigarh

1

2

CRM-M-16151-2025

the road leading from Rajetal toward Burj for supplying arms. If he is apprehended instantly then illegal arms can be recovered from his bag.

¶26

5. That it is submitted that after sending 'Ruqa', the police party headed by ASI Joginder Singh CIA Staff, Amritsar Rural had apprehended the above said Bikram Singh @ Bikram from the aforementioned place. The red colour bag holding in the hand of Bikram Singh @ Bikram was checked in presence of accompanying police officials, during which 04 pistol of 30 bore PX 5 Storm were recovered from the bag. The above said Bikram Singh @ Bikram could not produce any license or any other valid document to keep possession of the above recovered four pistols. Therefore, the above recovered 04 pistols, red colour bag, one mobile phone made Realme and Rs. 100/- recovered during personal search of the above said Bikram Singh @ Bikram were taken into police possession in accordance with law and the accused Bikram Singh @ Bikram was arrested in this case.

¶27

6. That it is submitted that the accused Bikram Singh @ Bikram was produced before the learned jurisdictional Court and his police remand was obtained. During police remand, the accused Bikram Singh @ Bikram made volunteer disclosure statement dated 22.01.2025 before the investigating officer that he had got smuggled the above recovered pistols through drone near village Bachiwind from one Smuggler Chacha of Pakistan, which were to be further handed over to the present petitioner Rupa Singh @ Ruby Slo Ghula r/o Chamiari now r/o Indira Colony, Gali No. 07, Kot Khalsa, Amritsar as per directions of Smuggler Chacha. Therefore, based on the aforesaid statement, the present petitioner Rupa Singh @ Ruby was also nominated as co-accused in this case. The disclosure statement of Bikram Singh is annexed herewith as Annexure R- 1/T for kind perusal of this Hon'ble Court.”

¶28

The petitioner's counsel prays for bail by imposing any stringent conditions and contends that further pre-trial incarceration would cause an irreversible injustice to the petitioner and their family.

¶29

The State’s counsel opposes bail and refers to the reply.

¶30

It would be appropriate to refer to the following portions of the reply, which read as follows:

¶31

“THE EVIDENCE BASED ON WHICH THE PETITIONER WAS ARRAIGNED AS AN ACCUSED

¶32

ANJU RANI 2025.04.23 14:39 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Punjab and Haryana High Court Chandigarh

2

3

CRM-M-16151-2025

14. That it is submitted that the present petitioner Rupa Singh @ Ruby was nominated as accused in the present case FIR No. 17 dated 21.01.2025 (supra) on the basis of disclosure statement suffered by the co-accused Bikramjit Singh.

¶37

THE EVIDENCE AGAINST THE PETITIONER

¶38

15. That it is submitted that the prosecution evidence against the present petitioner Jujhar Singh is primarily based on the disclosure statement suffered by the co-accused Bikramjit Singh and Jujhar Singh as well as by the petitioner Rupa Singh @ Ruby himself. Additionally, the scientific analysis of the mobile phone recovered from the petitioner Rupa Singh has established links of the present petitioner Rupa Singh @ Ruby. The mobile phone recovered from the co-accused Jujhar Singh was having photo of token note which was to be shown to the present petitioner-co-accused Jujhar Singh for receiving sale proceeds of the illegal weapons.

¶39

THE ROLE OF THE PETITIONER

¶40

16. That it is submitted that as per directions being received from Pakistani smuggler Chacha, the present petitioner Rupa Singh @ Ruby used to hand over sale proceeds of illegal weapons to the co-accused Jujhar Singh.”

¶41

REASONING:

¶42

Recovery of weapons have already been effected from the co-accused. Pre-trial incarceration should not be a replica of post-conviction sentencing. There is sufficient primafacie evidence connecting the petitioner with the alleged crime. Per the custody certificate dated 08.04.2025, the petitioner’s total custody in this FIR is 02 months & 13 days. Given the penal provisions invoked viz-a-viz pre-trial custody, coupled with the primafacie analysis of the nature of allegations, and the other factors peculiar to this case, there would be no justifiability for further pre-trial incarceration at this stage.

¶43

The investigation indicates that the petitioner is not the main accused, so the petitioner's bail shall not be treated as a precedent for granting bail to the other coaccused with a higher role.

¶44

Without commenting on the case's merits, in the facts and circumstances peculiar to this case, and for the reasons mentioned above, the petitioner makes a case for bail. This order shall come into force from the time it is uploaded on this Court's official webpage.

¶45

CONDITIONS:

¶46

Given above, provided the petitioner is not required in any other case, the ANJU RANI 2025.04.23 14:39 petitioner shall be released on bail in the FIR captioned above subject to furnishing bonds I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Punjab and Haryana High CourtChandigarh 3

¶47

4

¶48

CRM-M-16151-2025

¶49

to the satisfaction of the concerned Court and due to unavailability before any nearest Ilaqa Magistrate/duty Magistrate. Before accepting the surety, the concerned Court must be satisfied that if the accused fails to appear, such surety can produce the accused.

¶50

While furnishing a personal bond, the petitioner shall mention the following personal identification details:

¶51

1.	AADHAR number
2.	Passport number (If available) and when the attesting officer/court considers it appropriate or considers the accused a flight risk.
3.	Mobile number (If available)
4.	E-Mail id (If available)

¶52

This order is subject to the petitioner’s complying with the following terms.

¶53

The petitioner shall abide by all statutory bond conditions and appear before the concerned Court(s) on all dates. The petitioner shall not tamper with the evidence, influence, browbeat, pressurize, induce, threaten, or promise, directly or indirectly, any witnesses, Police officials, or any other person acquainted with the facts and circumstances of the case or dissuade them from disclosing such facts to the Police or the Court.

¶54

Given the background of allegations against the petitioner, it becomes paramount to protect the detection squad and their family members, as well as the members of society, and incapacitating the accused would be one of the primary options until the filing of the closure report or discharge, or acquittal. Consequently, it would be appropriate to restrict the possession of firearm(s). [This restriction is being imposed based on the preponderance of evidence of probability and not of evidence of certainty, i.e., beyond reasonable doubt; and as such, it is not to be construed as an intermediate sanction]. Given the nature of the allegations and the other circumstances peculiar to this case, the petitioner shall surrender all weapons, firearms, and ammunition, if any, along with the arms license to the concerned authority within fifteen days from release from prison and inform the Investigator about the compliance. However, subject to the Indian Arms Act, 1959, the petitioner shall be entitled to renew and take it back in case of acquittal in this case, provided otherwise permissible in the concerned rules. Restricting firearms would instill confidence in the victim(s), their families, and society; it would also restrain the accused from influencing the witnesses and repeating the offense.

¶55

The conditions mentioned above imposed by this court are to endeavor to reform and ensure the accused does not repeat the offense and also to block the menace of drug abuse. In Mohammed Zubair v. State of NCT of Delhi, 2022:INSC:735 [Para 28], Writ Petition (Criminal) No 279 of 2022, Para 29, decided on July 20, 2022, A Three-Judge bench of Hon’ble Supreme Court holds that “The bail conditions imposed by the Court must not only have a nexus to the purpose that they seek to serve but must also be

¶56

ANJU RANI 2025.04.23 14:39 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Punjab and Haryana High Court Chandigarh

4

5

CRM-M-16151-2025

proportional to the purpose of imposing them. The courts, while imposing bail conditions must balance the liberty of the accused and the necessity of a fair trial. While doing so, conditions that would result in the deprivation of rights and liberties must be eschewed.”

¶61

16. This bail is conditional, and the foundational condition is that if the petitioner indulges in any non-bailable offense, the State may file an application for cancellation of this bail before the Sessions Court, which shall have the liberty to cancel this bail .

¶62

Any observation made hereinabove is neither an expression of opinion on the case's merits nor shall the trial Court advert to these comments.

¶63

A certified copy of this order would not be needed for furnishing bonds, and any Advocate for the Petitioner can download this order along with case status from the official web page of this Court and attest it to be a true copy. If the attesting officer wants to verify its authenticity, such an officer can also verify its authenticity and may download and use the downloaded copy for attesting bonds.

¶64

Petition allowed in terms mentioned above. All pending applications, if any, stand disposed of.

¶65

(ANOOP CHITKARA) JUDGE 23.04.2025 anju rani Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes Whether reportable: No.

¶66

ANJU RANI 2025.04.23 14:39 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Punjab and Haryana High Court Chandigarh

¶67

5

Rupa Singh v. State of Punjab

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Rupa Singh v. State of Punjab

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Varinderpal Singh Vs State of Punjab

Satinder Singh @ Jojo Vs State of Punjab

Hari Bahadur Rawat Vs State of Haryana

Tek Singh Vs State of Haryana

Harpreet Singh Alias Gaggi Vs State of Punjab

Jasveer Singh Vs State of Punjab