Disposed¶17

Zeba Ansari v. State of Haryana and Another

Punjab & Haryana HC15 Jan 2025CRM-M/15939/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

CRM-M-15939-2024 (O&M), High Court of Punjab and Haryana, Alka Sarin J., decided 15.01.2025 — petition under S.439(2) read with S.482 CrPC for cancellation of anticipatory bail granted 03.10.2024 to respondent No.2 in FIR No.128 dated 27.11.2020, Sections 498-A, 406, 506, 377 and 34 IPC, PS Women West, Gurugram; settlement amount of ₹5,00,000 paid in full via two demand drafts of ₹2,50,000 each; parties to appear before Family Court in pending Section 13-B Hindu Marriage Act petition; petition and pending applications disposed of.

What did the court decide?

In view of the payment of the entire settlement amount and the parties' assurances, the petition for cancellation of anticipatory bail stands disposed of, and pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of. ¶17

Zeba Ansari Vs State of Haryana and Another — Matrimonial and Divorce | Punjab & Haryana HC (2025)

¶1

209

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

¶3

CRM-M-15939-2024 (O&M) Date of Decision : 15.01.2025

¶4

Zeba Ansari ... Petitioner(s) Versus State of Haryana & Anr ... Respondent(s)

¶5

CORAM : HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ALKA SARIN

¶6

Present : Dr. Sumati Jund, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Suneel Ranga, DAG Haryana for respondent No.1. Respondent No.2 – Sonu Ansari – in person.

¶7

ALKA SARIN, J. (Oral)

¶8

This is a petition under Section 439(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrPC) read with Section 482 of CrPC for cancellation of the anticipatory bail granted to respondent No.2 vide order dated 03.10.2024 in FIR No.128 dated 27.11.2020 registered under Sections 498-A, 406, 506, 377 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) at Police Station Women West, Gurugram, Haryana (Annexure P-1).

¶9

Learned counsel for the petitioner has stated that since the parties had compromised the matter and entered into a settlement, anticipatory bail was granted to respondent No.2. The learned counsel has further stated that after the settlement, the settlement amount of ₹5,00,000/was not paid to the petitioner herein nor respondent No.2 was appearing for recording of his statement before the Family Court concerned.

¶10

During the pendency of the present petition, ₹2,50,000/- was paid vide Demand Draft No.954866 dated 03.12.2024 drawn on State Bank

¶11

Yogesh Sharma 2025.01.16 10:04 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment. High Court Chandigarh

¶12

CRM-M-15939-2024

¶13

-2-

¶14

of India, Sector 5, Gurugram in the name of the petitioner, which was handed over to the learned counsel for the petitioner on 16.12.2024 in Court. Today a Demand Draft bearing No.954871 dated 07.01.2025 amounting to ₹2,50,000/- drawn on State Bank of India, Mehrauli Road, Gurugram, in the name of the petitioner, has also been handed over to the learned counsel for the petitioner in Court.

¶15

Learned counsel for the petitioner states that as per the settlement the entire amount now stands paid.

¶16

Respondent No.2 who is present in Court and the counsel for the petitioner state that both the petitioner and respondent No.2 would appear before the Family Court concerned for recording of their respective statements in the petition which has been filed under Section 13-B of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955. The learned counsel for the petitioner has also assured the Court that the petitioner would abide by the terms and conditions of the settlement and would also cooperate in the quashing petition once the mutual consent divorce is granted by the Family Court.

¶17

In view of the above, the present petition stands disposed off. Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed off.

¶18

15.01.2025 Yogesh Sharma

¶19

( ALKA SARIN ) JUDGE

¶20

NOTE: Whether speaking/non-speaking: Speaking Whether reportable: YES/NO

¶21

Yogesh Sharma 2025.01.16 10:04 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment. High Court Chandigarh

Zeba Ansari v. State of Haryana and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Zeba Ansari v. State of Haryana and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Jawahar Singh Vs Narinder Singh

Ranjit Kaur Vs Raj Kumar & Ors.

Rajinder Singh Alias Joginder Singh Alias Ginder Singh and Another Vs Amar Singh

Jai Bharat Rice Mills Vs District Food and Supplies Controller Palwal and Anr.

Baldev Singh Vs Shivdeep Singh and Another

Oriental Insurance Company Vs Sukhwant Pal Kaur and Ors.