Arun and Sanjay Vs State of Haryana

The prayer in the present appeal is to set-aside the judgment of conviction dated 22.12.2006 and order of sentence dated 23.12.2006 passed by learned Judge, Special Court, Jhajjar whereby the appellants were convicted and sentenced for the offence punishable under Section 20 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (hereinafter ‘the NDPS Act’), in the case stemming from FIR No.65 dated 09.04.2004 registered under Section 20 of the NDPS Act at Police Station Beri.

¶16

The appellants Arun and Sanjay were found in possession of 175 gms of Charas and 250 gms of Charas, respectively, for which they were convicted and sentenced as follows:-

¶17

Offence	Sentence
Section 20 of the Narcotic Drugs	Rigorous imprisonment for a period of
and Psychotropic Substances Act,	05 years each and to pay fine of
1985	Rs.20,000/- each and in default of
	payment of fine, to further undergo

¶18

MOHD YAKUB 2025.05.21 15:51 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Punjab & Haryana High Court at Chandigarh

¶19

CRA-S-138-SB-2007

¶20

2

¶21

rigorous imprisonment for 03 months each.

¶22

Learned State counsel at the very outset, on instructions from ASI Ashok Kumar, submits that appellant No.1 – Arun had died on 28.11.2017 and appellant No.2 – Sanjay had also died 12 years ago, during the pendency of the present appeal. In this regard, the death certificate of appellant No.1 as well as statement of Sarpanch of Gram Panchayat Karondha, District Bhiwani, have been produced, which are taken on record as Mark X.

¶23

In view of the judgment rendered by this Court in Shivji Ram @ Dimple vs. State of Punjab 2023(1) R.C.R.(criminal) 738 as well as the Full Bench of the Kerala High Court in Pazhani S/o Chami vs. State of Kerala 2017(1) R.C.R. (Criminal) 1045 , the present appeal is disposed of with the following directions:

¶24

1. The instant appeal stands abated on account of death of the appellanst.

¶25

2. The State exchequer shall be at liberty to recover the fine amount by adopting due process of the law.

¶26

3. If State chooses to start recovery process of the amount of fine from the estate of the deceased appellants, a valid notice in that regard would be served upon the legal heirs who have a vested right in the said estate.

¶27

4. If any such legal heir(s) or any interested person(s) are aggrieved with the process of recovery of fine, they may move an appropriate application before this Court seeking revival of the appeal. However, the same must be done within a period of 30 days of receipt of such notice.

¶28

MOHD YAKUB 2025.05.21 15:51 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Punjab & Haryana High Court at Chandigarh

¶29

CRA-S-138-SB-2007

¶30

3

¶31

5. Such legal heir(s) or any interested person(s) would also be at liberty to deposit the total amount of fine, which is subject matter of the appeal, in the office of concerned authority.

¶32

6. If revived, the appeal shall be heard on merits.

¶33

All the pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of.

¶34

(HARPREET SINGH BRAR) JUDGE 19.05.2025 yakub Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether reportable: Yes/No

¶35

MOHD YAKUB 2025.05.21 15:51 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Punjab & Haryana High Court at Chandigarh

Arun and Sanjay v. State of Haryana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Arun and Sanjay v. State of Haryana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Rohan Vs State of Haryana and Others

Kirpal Singh and Others Vs State of Punjab and Others

Sat Pal Singh Vs State of Punjab

Naveen Kumar Alias Titu Vs State of Haryana

Gisela Singh Vs State of Haryana and Ors.

Vedpal Singh Vs State of Hry.