Disposed¶21

Mohinder Singh v. Gurudwara Singh Sabha

Punjab & Haryana HC28 Nov 2025CR/6531/2014

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Mohinder Singh v. Gurudwara Singh Sabha; Civil Revision No.6531 of 2014 (O&M); Punjab and Haryana High Court; Nidhi Gupta J.; Yamuna Nagar Rent Controller; Appellate Authority; Order 9 Rule 13 CPC; ex-parte ejectment order; ex-parte final order; execution of ejectment order stayed; death/expiry of petitioner; no legal representatives; disposal for non-representation; liberty to revive within 02 months; 28.11.2025.

What did the court decide?

Revision petition disposed of with liberty to the legal representative(s) of the deceased petitioner to move an appropriate application within 02 months for reviving the same, if so advised; pending application(s), if any, disposed of. ¶21

Mohinder Singh Vs Gurudwara Singh Sabha — Punjab & Haryana HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

What the court decided

AI extract

Outcome

¶21

Issue for consideration

Whether the ex-parte order dated 15.9.2011, ex-parte final order dated 05.05.2012 and order dated 12.3.2014 (dismissing the application under Order 9 Rule 13 CPC) of the learned Rent Controller, Yamuna Nagar, and the Appellate Authority's order dated 03.9.2014 dismissing the petitioner's civil misc. appeal, should be quashed (framed from the prayer; not adjudicated on merits). +1 more

¶14

Ratio / Principle

The instant revision petition is disposed of, with liberty to the legal representative(s) of the petitioner to move an appropriate application within 02 months from the date of the order for reviving the same, if so advised.

¶21

Key takeaways

Pending application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of.ratio¶23

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

High Court of Punjab and Haryana (Nidhi Gupta J., oral order dated 28.11.2025) disposed of Civil Revision No.6531 of 2014 (O&M), Mohinder Singh v. Gurudwara Singh Sabha, Yamuna Nagar, without adjudicating merits. The revision sought quashing of the ex-parte order dated 15.9.2011, ex-parte final order dated 05.05.2012, the order dated 12.3.2014 dismissing the application under Order 9 Rule 13 CPC (learned Rent Controller, Yamuna Nagar), and the order dated 03.9.2014 of the learned Appellate Authority, Yamuna Nagar dismissing the petitioner's civil misc. appeal; execution of the ejectment order had been stayed by a predecessor Bench on 16.12.2014. With no appearance for any party since 04.3.2025, respondent's counsel reporting the petitioner's expiry, and office report dated 18.11.2025 showing counsel H.P.S. Ishar merely emailed with no representation, the Court disposed of the revision with liberty to the legal representative(s) to seek revival within 02 months; pending applications were disposed of.

¶1

Civil Revision No.6531 of 2014 (O & M) 1

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

¶3

211

¶4

Civil Revision No.6531 of 2014 (O & M) Date of decision :-28.11.2025

Mohinder Singh

…..Petitioner

Versus

Gurudwara Singh Sabha through Sh. Harsharan Singh, Member Gurudwara Prabandhak Committee, Jamuna Gali, Yamuna Nagar

¶9

…..Respondent

¶10

CORAM:- HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA

¶11

Present:None for the petitioner.

¶12

Mr. J.S. Chahal, Advocate f o r the respondent.

¶13

NIDHI GUPTA J. (Oral)

¶14

Prayer in the present revisio n petition is for quashing the ex-parte order dated 15.9.2011 and ex-parte final order dated 05.05.20 1 2 and order dated 12.3.2014 ( A nnexures P-2, P-3 and P-5 respectiv e ly) whereby application unde r Order 9 Rule 13 CPC has been dis m issed by the learned Rent C o ntroller, Yamuna Nagar; as well as t he order dated 03.9.2014 (A n nexure P-8) passed by the learned A ppellate Authority, Yamuna N a gar, whereby the civil misc. appeal filed by the petitioner has been dismissed.

¶15

Perusal of the order shee t s show that there was no represent a tion on behalf of any of the parties on the last date of hearing i . e. 04.3.2025. Moreover, vide order dated 16.12.2014, the

¶16

VIJAY ASIJA 2025.11.29 16.43 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

¶17

Civil Revision No.6531 of 2014 (O & M) 2

¶18

predeces s or Bench of this Court had s tayed the execution of the ejectmen t order.

¶19

It is informed by learned co u nsel for the respondent that the petiti o ner has expired.

¶20

As per office report dated 18.11.2025, learned counsel Mr. H.P. S . Ishar, Advocate for the petit i oner has been informed via email ab o ut the date fixed, however, t h ere is no representation on behalf of petitioner.

¶21

In this position, when th e petitioner is stated to be expired, l earned counsel for the petition e r is not coming forward and there is no intimation about the le g al representative(s) of the deceased / petitioner, the instant revision p etition is disposed of , with liberty t o the legal representative(s) o f the petitioner, to move an appropri a te application within a period o f 02 months from today for reviving t he same, if so, advised.

¶22

Copy of this order be sent to the parties.

¶23

Pending application(s), if an y , shall stands disposed of.

¶24

Novemb e r 28, 2025 ( NIDHI GUPTA ) Vijay Asija JUDGE

¶25

Whether sp e aking/reasoned Yes / No Whether Re p ortable Yes / No

¶26

VIJAY ASIJA 2025.11.29 16.43 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

Mohinder Singh v. Gurudwara Singh Sabha

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mohinder Singh v. Gurudwara Singh Sabha

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Om Parkash Alias Chhotu Vs Banarsi Devi

Balwan Singh Vs Balraj Singh and Others

Punjab National Bank Vs Davinder Kaur and Ors.

Ajit Jain Vs Sumit Parsad Jain and Others

Bishamber Vs M/S the New India Assurance Comp Ltd. and Ors.

Mahendri Devi & Anr. Vs Ravindra Kumar Mishra & Others