Disposed¶20

Manjit Singh and Another v. Amar Singh and Others

Punjab & Haryana HC22 Aug 2025CR/5664/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Punjab and Haryana High Court; CR-5664-2025; Article 227 Constitution of India; revision for early/expedited disposal; Additional District Judge SAS Nagar (Mohali); Civil Miscellaneous Application No.289 of 2022; Civil Appeal No.225 of 2019; notice dispensed with; status quo suit property; disposed without opinion on merits; Amarinder Singh Grewal, J.; Manjit Singh v. Amar Singh.

What did the court decide?

Direction to the learned Additional District Judge, SAS Nagar (Mohali) to decide Civil Miscellaneous Application No.289 of 2022 and Civil Appeal No.225 of 2019 as expeditiously as possible, in accordance with law; notice to respondents dispensed with; pending application(s) disposed of. The status quo prayer was not specifically dealt with. ¶20

Manjit Singh and Another Vs Amar Singh and… — Writ and Judicial Review | Punjab & Haryana HC (2025)

What the court decided

AI extract

Outcome

¶20

Issue for consideration

Whether the Additional District Judge, SAS Nagar (Mohali) should be directed to decide Civil Miscellaneous Application No.289 of 2022 and Civil Appeal No.225 of 2019 at the earliest, as prayed in the Article 227 revision petition. +1 more

¶15

Court's answer

Notice to the respondents was dispensed with because the relief sought was limited and issuing notice would further delay the proceedings.

¶17

Ratio / Principle

The revision petition stands disposed of without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case.

¶20

Key takeaways

The learned Additional District Judge, SAS Nagar (Mohali) is directed to decide Civil Miscellaneous Application No.289 of 2022 and Civil Appeal No.225 of 2019 as expeditiously as possible, in accordance with law.ratio¶20
Pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of.ratio¶21

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

Revision under Article 227 of the Constitution of India — Manjit Singh and Another v. Amar Singh and Others (CR-5664-2025, decided 22.08.2025) — petition sought a direction to the First Appellate Court/Additional District Judge, SAS Nagar (Mohali) to decide Civil Miscellaneous Application No.289 of 2022 and Civil Appeal No.225 of 2019 at the earliest, and interim status quo regarding the suit property. Considering the limited nature of the relief, notice to respondents was dispensed with; the revision petition was disposed of without expressing any opinion on the merits, with a direction to the Additional District Judge to decide the CMA and the appeal as expeditiously as possible in accordance with law; pending application(s) were also disposed of.

¶1

CR-5664-2025

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

¶3

(116)

¶4

CR-5664-2025 Date of Decision:-22.08.2025

¶5

Manjit Singh and Another

¶6

……Petitioner

¶7

Versus

¶8

Amar Singh and Others

¶9

……Respondent

¶10

CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE AMARINDER SINGH GREWAL

¶11

¶12

Present: Mr. Onkar Rai, Advocate, for the petitioners.

¶13

¶14

AMARINDER SINGH GREWAL, J. (Oral)

¶15

The present revision petition has been filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India seeking a direction to the learned First Appellate Court/Additional District Judge, SAS Nagar (Mohali) to decide Civil Miscellaneous Application No.289 of 2022 and Civil Appeal No.225 of 2019 (Annexures P-7 & P-3, respectively) at the earliest. It is also prayed that till the disposal of the Civil Miscellaneous Application, the parties may be directed to maintain status quo regarding the suit property.

¶16

Heard.

¶17

Considering the limited nature of the relief sought by the petitioner, issuance of notice to the respondents is dispensed with, as the same would further delay the proceedings.

¶18

-1-

¶19

SHUBHAM 2025.08.26 10:11 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document/order

¶20

In view of the averments made in the petition, the present revision petition stands disposed of, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case. The learned Additional District Judge, SAS Nagar (Mohali) is directed to decide Civil Miscellaneous Application No.289 of 2022 and Civil Appeal No.225 of 2019, as expeditiously as possible, in accordance with law.

¶21

Pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of

¶22

(AMARINDER SINGH GREWAL) JUDGE

¶23

22.08.2025 Shubham

¶24

Whether speaking/reasoned:-	Yes/No
Whether Reportable:-	Yes/No

¶25

-2-

¶26

SHUBHAM 2025.08.26 10:11 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document/order

Manjit Singh and Another v. Amar Singh and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Manjit Singh and Another v. Amar Singh and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Bir Singh (Veer Singh) & Ors. Vs Dharambir & Ors.

Banarsi Dass Vs Baljit Singh and Ros

Jilo and Ors. Vs Sardul Singh & Ors.

Radhika Goyal Vs Tarunpreet Singh Sethi

Surinder Kaur Vs Vikki Ram and Another

Varinder Pal Singh Vs Vinod Kumar & Others