Dismissed¶16

M/S Dlf Home Developers Limited v. Krishan Yadav and Others

Punjab & Haryana HC9 Jul 2025CR/2872/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

CR-2872-2019 (O&M); Punjab and Haryana High Court; DLF Home Developers Ltd v. Krishan Yadav & Ors; revision petition dismissed as not pressed; Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 CPC interim injunction application; trial court directed to expedite hearing, no unnecessary adjournments; Alka Sarin J; decision dated 09.07.2025.

What did the court decide?

Revision petition dismissed as not pressed; Trial Court requested to expedite the hearing of the suit and to not grant unnecessary adjournments to either party; pending applications, if any, disposed of. ¶16

M/S Dlf Home Developers Limited Vs Krishan Yadav and Others — Punjab & Haryana HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

313

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

¶3

CR-2872-2019 (O&M) Date of Decision : 09.07.2025

¶4

M/s DLF Home Developers Limited ... Petitioner(s)

¶5

Versus

¶6

Krishan Yadav & Ors ... Respondent(s)

¶7

CORAM : HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ALKA SARIN

¶8

Present : Mr. Kunal Dawar, Advocate and Mr. Vipul Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner.

¶9

None for the respondents.

¶10

ALKA SARIN, J. (Oral)

¶11

Challenge in the present revision petition is to the order dated 22.05.2018 (Annexure P-13) passed by the Trial Court partly allowing the application of the plaintiff-petitioner under Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908. Aggrieved by the same, both the plaintiff and the defendants had filed appeals before the First Appellate Court and both the appeals were dismissed vide the order dated 20.11.2018 (Annexure P-18). Aggrieved by the same, the present revision petition has been preferred only by the plaintiff. The defendants have not challenged the order dismissing their appeal.

¶12

Learned counsel for the plaintiff-petitioner at the outset states that since the suit is at the fag end, hence, he does not wish to press the present petition. He, however, prays that the Trial Court be directed to expedite the hearing of the suit.

¶13

Yogesh Sharma 2025.07.10 10:25 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this judgment/order. Chandigarh

¶14

-2-

¶15

CR-2872-2019 (O&M)

¶16

In view of the above, the present revision petition is dismissed as not pressed. However, the Trial Court is requested to expedite the hearing of the matter in accordance with law and not grant any unnecessary adjournments to either of the parties. Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed off.

¶17

09.07.2025 ( ALKA SARIN ) Yogesh Sharma JUDGE

¶18

NOTE: Whether speaking/non-speaking: Speaking Whether reportable: YES/NO

¶19

Yogesh Sharma 2025.07.10 10:25 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this judgment/order. Chandigarh

M/S Dlf Home Developers Limited v. Krishan Yadav and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

M/S Dlf Home Developers Limited v. Krishan Yadav and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Jasbir Grewal Andanr Vs Pritam Kaur Deceased through Lrs and Ors.

Daya Chand Vs Raj Kumar Tayal and Others

Raj Kumar Tayal Vs Nirmal Singh and Others

United India Insurance Company Ltd. Vs Smt. Bala Devi and Others

Karanvir Singh Vs Sukhjinder Kaur

New India Ass.Co. Ltd. Vs Bala Devi