Disposed¶14

Ram Kumar Deceased through His Lrs v. Pawan Kumar and Others

Punjab & Haryana HC26 Mar 2025CR/1746/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

CR-1746-2025; civil revision disposed with liberty to revive; adjournment sought without adjournment slip; objection of Sandeep, Sanjeet and Pardeep dismissed by Annexure P-6; warrants of possession issued by order dated 15.02.2025 (Annexure P-7) not challenged; Ram Kumar (since deceased) through his LRs v. Pawan Kumar and others; Punjab and Haryana High Court at Chandigarh; Vikas Bahl, J.; decision dated 26.03.2025.

What did the court decide?

Liberty to the petitioner(s) to revive the revision petition when ready to argue the matter, with a direction that the revival application explain the challenge to Annexure P-6 and address the fact that warrants of possession were issued by the unchallenged order dated 15.02.2025 (Annexure P-7). ¶14

Ram Kumar Deceased through His Lrs Vs Pawan Kumar and Others — Punjab & Haryana HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

What the court decided

AI extract

Outcome

¶14

Issue for consideration

How the petitioner(s) can challenge the order (Annexure P-6) when, as per that order, the objections dismissed were those of Sandeep, Sanjeet and Pardeep and not those of the petitioner(s); the court required this to be explained in the application for revival.

¶15

Court's answer

In the application for revival, the petitioner(s) must also explain how they can challenge the order (Annexure P-6), which dismissed the objections of Sandeep, Sanjeet and Pardeep and not those of the petitioner(s).

¶15

Ratio / Principle

The revision petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner(s) to revive it when ready to argue the matter, no adjournment slip having been filed in support of the adjournment prayer.

¶14

Key takeaways

On a perusal of Annexure P-6, no warrants of possession were issued by that order; warrants of possession were issued by the order dated 15.02.2025 (Annexure P-7), which has not been challenged in the present revision petition.obiter¶15

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

High Court of Punjab and Haryana (Vikas Bahl, J., oral) disposed of civil revision CR-1746-2025, Ram Kumar (since deceased) through his LRs v. Pawan Kumar and others, on 26.03.2025. Counsel for the petitioners prayed for adjournment but filed no adjournment slip; the Court accordingly disposed of the revision petition with liberty to revive it when the petitioners are ready to argue. The Court directed that, in the application for revival, the petitioners must explain how they can challenge the order (Annexure P-6) when, per that order, the objections dismissed were those of Sandeep, Sanjeet and Pardeep and not those of the petitioners. The Court further observed that no warrants of possession were issued by Annexure P-6; warrants of possession were issued by the order dated 15.02.2025 (Annexure P-7), which was not challenged in the revision petition.

Ram Kumar Deceased through His Lrs v. Pawan Kumar and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ram Kumar Deceased through His Lrs v. Pawan Kumar and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M/S Indian Gases & Anr. Vs Gian Kaur

State of Pb.Etc. Vs Gulzar Singh

Madan Lal Devgan Vs Krishan Lal

Vijay Kumar Garg Vs Naveen Garg and Ors.

Lovejit Singh Vs Jasbir Singh and Another

Harminder Singh @ Kaka Vs Tejinder Singh