Dismissed¶19
Pargat Singh v. Satnam Singh
Punjab & Haryana HCCR/1707/2021
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Default dismissal for want of prosecution; counsel for petitioner had no instructions and nobody appeared; Pargat Singh v. Satnam Singh; CR-1707-2021 (O&M); High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh; Deepak Gupta, J. (oral); decision date 07.07.2025; non-reportable order; no substantive issue decided, no statute or precedent cited.
What did the court decide?
Learned counsel for the petitioner made a statement that he had no instructions for putting appearance on behalf of the petitioner, and nobody else appeared for the petitioner. ¶17