Surinder Mittal v. Rajwinder Gogna

What is this about?

The judgment text is almost wholly unreadable owing to character-encoding corruption across paragraphs 1-18; no court, case number, case type, parties, advocates, procedural history, statutes, cited cases, issues, holdings or outcome are recoverable from the supplied text. The only legible passage is the closing e-signature attestation at paragraph 19 ('CHETAN THAKUR 2025.02.06 15:29 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment.'), from which the sole coram entry and the provisional decision date (2025-02-06, raw form 2025.02.06) are drawn. All other fields are reported as unavailable rather than inferred; a clean copy should be re-ingested before this record is relied upon or cited.