Revision petition against execution proceedings dismissed after the court noted the execution application had already been fully satisfied on the e-Court website and the petitioners did not appear despite being called twice.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT O F PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
119 CR-1223-2025 (O&M) Date of Decision : 05.05.2025
M/s Mad Spice Company and Another
....Petitioners
VERSUS
Manjnder Singh ....Respondents
CORAM : HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE ALKA SARIN
Present : None.
ALKA SARIN, J. (Oral)
( ALKA SARIN )
05.05.2025 JUDGE jk
NOTE: Whether speaking/non-speaking: Speaking Whether reportable: YES/NO
JITENDER KUMAR 2025.05.06 10:31 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh
1 issue framed by the court
Was the revision petition infructuous given the execution application stood disposed of as fully satisfied?
M/s Mad Spice Company and Another
Manjnder Singh
Alka Sarin
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
