Dismissed¶14

Phuman Singh v. Surjan Singh

Punjab & Haryana HC28 Jan 2025COCP/90/2010

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Punjab & Haryana High Court, Chandigarh; COCP No.90 of 2010 (O&M); Phuman Singh v. Surjan Singh; oral order dated 28.01.2025 by Justice Deepak Gupta; contempt petition dismissed in default for want of prosecution on account of repeated non-appearance of petitioner/counsel despite Registry intimation to K.S. Brar and G.S. Punia; respondent represented by Lavish Arora; no merits adjudication; relevant to practice/procedure on non-prosecution and dismissal in default.

What did the court decide?

It is apparent that the petitioner is no longer interested in pursuing this appeal. ¶13

Phuman Singh Vs Surjan Singh — Punjab & Haryana HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

218-a IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

¶2

COCP No.90 of 2010 (O&M) Date of Decision: January 28, 2025

¶3

Phuman Singh …Pe22oner

¶4

Versus

¶5

Surjan Singh …Respondent

¶6

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK GUPTA

¶7

Present: - None for the appellant.

¶8

Mr. Lavish Arora, Advocate for the respondent.

¶9

DEEPAK GUPTA, J.(Oral)

¶10

On the last date of hearing, following order was passed:-

¶11

“There is no representa�on on behalf of the appellant.

¶12

In the interest of jus�ce, adjourned to 28.01.2025. In�ma�on to the counsel for the appellant be sent for the date fixed, making it clear that no further opportunity shall be provided. A photocopy of this order be placed on the file of connected case.”

¶13

Today again there is no representa#on on behalf of the pe##oner. In compliance of the aforesaid order, in#ma#on to Shri K.S. Brar and Sh. G.S. Punia, Advocates for the pe##oner was sent, as reported by the Registry. S#ll, nobody has put in appearance on behalf of the pe##oner. In the circumstances, it is apparent that the pe##oner is no longer interested in pursuing this appeal.

¶14

Dismissed in default for want of prosecu#on.

¶15

January 28, 2025	(DEEPAK GUPTA)
sarita	JUDGE
Whether reasoned/speaking:	Yes/No
Whether reportable:	Yes/No

¶16

Sarita Rani 2025.01.29 10:13 I attest to the accuracy of this document/order

Phuman Singh v. Surjan Singh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Phuman Singh v. Surjan Singh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Minakshi Vs Board of Secondary Education and Others

Rupinder Singh Vs the Appellate Authority

Satpal Singh Vs the Punjab State Cooperative Supply and Mktg Fed Ltd. through Its Managing Director and Others

Rekha Vs State of Punjab and Others

Municipal Committee,Kaithal Vs Jai Bhagwan

Suja Singh Vs Gurmej Singh