Dismissed¶14

Rajinder Singh @Raj Singh v. Nitish Singla

Punjab & Haryana HC3 Apr 2025COCP/3194/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Rajinder Singh @ Raj Singh v. Nitish Singla, COCP-3194-2016, High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh, decision date April 03, 2025, coram Harkesh Manuja, J. (oral). Contempt petition concerning compliance with order dated 15.07.2016 in CWP-13828-2016; State counsel reported compliance; petition dismissed as not pressed with liberty to avail appropriate remedies in accordance with law; rule discharged. Petitioner's counsel: J.P.S. Sidhu; State counsel: Gunjan Mehta, Addl. A.G. Punjab. No statutes or precedent cases cited; no quantum involved.

What did the court decide?

Liberty to the petitioner to avail his appropriate remedies in accordance with law; rule discharged. ¶14

Rajinder Singh @Raj Singh Vs Nitish Singla — Punjab & Haryana HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

102

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP-3194-2016 Date of Decision: April 03, 2025

¶3

RAJINDER SINGH @RAJ SINGH

........Petitioner

Versus

NITISH SINGLA

........Respondent

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH MANUJA

¶9

Present: M r. J.P.S. Sidhu, Advocate for the petitioner. ( T hrough video conferencing).

¶10

M r . Gunjan Mehta, Addl. A.G. P unjab. ****

¶11

HARKESH MANUJA, J. (ORAL)

¶12

L e arned State counsel submit s that order dated 15.07.201 6 passed in C W P-13828-2016 has now bee n complied with.

¶13

In view of the aforesaid, learned counsel for the petitione r does not pre s s the present petition, howe v er, seeks liberty to avail hi s appropriate r e medies in accordance with l a w

¶14

Di s missed as not pressed with a foresaid liberty. R u le discharged.

03.04.2025

Tejwinder

(HARKESH MANUJA)