Dismissed¶14

Deepak v. Vinay Kumar and Another

Punjab & Haryana HC21 Jan 2025COCP/230/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Deepak v. Vinay Kumar and another, COCP-230-2025, High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh, decision dated January 21, 2025, Harkesh Manuja, J. Contempt petition concerning compliance with order dated 24.09.2024; compliance stated to have been effected by speaking order dated 20.01.2025; petition dismissed as not pressed with liberty to challenge the speaking order; rule discharged. Counsel: S.S. Mor for petitioner; Kanwal Goyal for respondent No.1; Amit Aggarwal, DAG, Haryana. No statutes or precedents discussed.

What did the court decide?

Petition dismissed as not pressed, with liberty to the petitioner to challenge the speaking order dated 20.01.2025 in accordance with law; rule discharged. ¶14

Deepak Vs Vinay Kumar and Another — Punjab & Haryana HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

203

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

¶3

COCP-230-2025

¶4

Date of Decision: January 21, 2025

¶5

DEEPAK ........Petitioner

¶6

Versus

¶7

VINAY KUMAR AND ANOTHER ........Respondents

¶8

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH MANUJA

¶9

Present: M r. S.S. Mor, Advocate for the petitioner.

¶10

M r. Kanwal Goyal, Advocate f o r respondent No.1 M r . Amit Aggarwal, DAG, Hary a na. ****

¶11

HARKESH MANUJA, J. (ORAL)

¶12

L e arned counsel for respond e nt No.1 submits that orde r dated 24.09. 2 024 has now been complie d with by passing a speakin g order dated 2 0 .01.2025.

¶13

In view of the aforesaid, learned counsel for the petitione r does not pre s s the present petition, how e ver, with liberty to challeng e the same in a c cordance with law

¶14

Di s missed as not pressed with a foresaid liberty. R u le discharged.

21.01.2025

Tejwinder

(HARKESH MANUJA)