Dismissed¶21

Ajit Singh Sandhu v. Deepak Parek Ssp, Mohali

Punjab & Haryana HC19 May 2025COCP/1370/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

COCP No. 1370 of 2025 (O&M), Punjab & Haryana High Court, Chandigarh; decided 19.05.2025 by Hon'ble Mr. Justice Harkesh Manuja (oral). Petitioner: Ajit Singh Sandhu (advocate Nikhil Ghai). Respondent: Deepak Pareek, SSP, SAS Nagar (Mohali) (Athar Ahmad, DAG, Punjab). Dismissed as not pressed after respondent's affidavit reply (23.04.2025) showed compliance with order dated 11.02.2025 in CRM-M-7646-2025 (Ajit Singh Sandhu v. State of Punjab and others); rule discharged; liberty to seek remedy as per law retained; miscellaneous applications disposed of. No monetary quantum involved.

What did the court decide?

The petition is dismissed as not pressed, counsel for the petitioner having conceded that necessary compliance with the order dated 11.02.2025 in CRM-M-7646-2025 had been made. ¶21

Ajit Singh Sandhu Vs Deepak Parek Ssp, Mohali — Punjab & Haryana HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

176

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

¶3

COCP No. 1370 of 2025 (O&M) Date of Decision: 19.05.2025

¶4

Ajit Singh Sandhu

¶5

.......... Petitioner

¶6

Versus

¶7

Deepak Pareek, Senior Superintendent of Police, SAS Nagar (Mohali)

¶8

.......... Respondent

¶9

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH MANUJA

¶10

Present: Mr. Nikhil Ghai, Advocate for the petitioner.

¶11

Mr. Athar Ahmad, DAG, Punjab for the respondent.

¶12

¶13

HARKESH MANUJA, J. (ORAL)

¶14

Learned counsel for the respondent has filed reply by way of affidavit dated 23.04.2025 of respondent-Sh. Deepak Pareek, SSP, SAS Nagar (Mohali), which is taken on record. Copy thereof has been supplied to the opposite side. Registry to place / paginate the same at appropriate place in the paper-book.

¶15

[2] Learned counsel for the respondent, by referring to the aforesaid reply, submits that in terms of order dated 11.02.2025 (Annexure P-2) passed by this Court in CRM-M-7646-2025 , titled “Ajit Singh Sandhu

¶16

Versus State of Punjab and others” , necessary compliance has been made while deciding the complaint / representation submitted by the petitioner; thus, no cause survives in the present petition.

¶17

Dinesh Kumar 2025.05.20 15:17 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

¶18

COCP No. 1370 of 2025 (O&M)

¶19

[2]

¶20

[3] In response, learned counsel for the petitioner concedes the aforesaid factual position; thus, he does not press the present petition any further.

¶21