The High Court of Punjab and Haryana allowed the withdrawal of appeal VATAP-61-2019, dismissed the main case, and vacated all interim orders upon the application.
Withdrawal of appeal allowed; main case dismissed as withdrawn; all interim orders vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
102 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CM-16369-CII-2024 in/and VATAP-61-2019 (O&M) Date of Decision: 25.09.2024
M/S OM PRA K ASH KRISHAN LAL, JAGAD H RI
. . . . Appellan t
Vs.
STATE OF H A RYANA AND ANR
. . . . Respondent s
****
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY VASHISTH
Present M r. Sameesh Bassi, Advocate for M r. Sandeep Goyal, Advocate f or the applicant/appellant.
M s. Mamta Singla Talwar, DAG, H aryana.
SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA, J.(Oral)
(SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA) JUDGE
(SANJAY VASHISTH) JUDGE
September 25, 2024
Mohit goyal
1. Whether speaking/reasoned? Yes/No 2. Whether reportable? r reportable? Yes/No
2. Whether reportable? r reportable?
MOHIT GOYAL 2024.09.25 17:15 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to allow withdrawal of appeal VATAP-61-2019.
M/S OM PRAKASH KRISHAN LAL, JAGADHRI
STATE OF HARYANA AND ANR
SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA
SANJAY VASHISTH
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
