Transfer application not pressed; counsel sought withdrawal with liberty to file a fresh application with better particulars, which the High Court permitted.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Sr. No.108
TA-999-2024 Date of Decision: 23.08.2024
DIKSHA SHARMA
....Applicant
Versus
JAGDEEP SINGH
.....Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ARCHANA PURI
Present:Mr. Vasu Ranjan Shandilya, Advocate for the applicant.
ARCHANA PURI, J. (Oral)
At this stage, learned counsel for the applicant submits that he does not want to pursue with the present transfer application, which may be dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty to file fresh one, with better particulars.
Ordered accordingly.
(ARCHANA PURI) 23.08.2024 JUDGE ���� Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No
Sonu 2024.08.23 14:47 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document P&HHC
Diksha Sharma
Jagdeep Singh
Archana Puri
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
