Wife sought transfer of her husband's divorce petition under Section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act from Hoshiarpur to Jalandhar, citing the settled principle that the wife's convenience prevails. The respondent conceded; the court allowed the transfer with directions for record transmission and mediation.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
222
2024:PHHC:034217
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
TA-74-2023 Date of Decision: 11.03.2024
MANPREET KAUR
….Petitioner
VERSUS
JAGJIT SINGH RAI ….Respondent
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS SURI
Present: Mr. Kapil Khanna, Advocate for the petitioner.
Ms. Ekta Kalia, Advoate for the respondent.
VIKAS SURI, J. (Oral)
SANGEETA 2024.05.10 13:38 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment
2024:PHHC:034217
TA-74-2023
�
March 11, 2024 Sangeeta
(VIKAS SURI) JUDGE
Whether reasoned/speaking: Yes/No Whether reportable: Yes/No
SANGEETA 2024.05.10 13:38 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment
1 issue framed by the court
Should the husband's divorce petition pending at Hoshiarpur be transferred to Jalandhar in view of the wife's convenience?
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Manpreet Kaur
Jagjit Singh Rai
Vikas Suri
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
