Transfer application dismissed for want of prosecution as the applicant failed to file process fee and did not appear; service of the respondent could not be effected.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Sr. No.239
TA-728-2024 Date of Decision:17.12.2024
MEENAKSHI RANI � ...Applicant
Versus
NAVEEN KUMAR RAGHAV .....Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ARCHANA PURI
Present:None for the applicant.
ARCHANA PURI, J. (Oral)
As per office noting, service of the respondent could not be effected as process fee has not been filed.
Seemingly, the applicant is not interested to pursue with the transfer application. Hence, the same is dismissed for want of prosecution.
| 17.12.2024 |
(ARCHANA PURI) JUDGE |
||
|---|---|---|---|
| ��� | |||
| Whether speaking/reasoned | : | Yes/No | |
| Whether reportable | : | Yes/No |
Anu 2024.12.18 11:20 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
MEENAKSHI RANI
NAVEEN KUMAR RAGHAV
ARCHANA PURI
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
