The High Court, Chandigarh disposed of appeal STA-6-2024 as withdrawn by the appellant. The principal commissioner had preferred the appeal against a CIT order; counsel for the appellant sought withdrawal which was allowed.
Withdrawal of the present appeal allowed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
STA-6-2024 (O&M)
266
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CM-18833-CII-2024 in/and STA-6-2024 (O&M) Date of Decision: 09.12.2024
PRINCIPAL C OMMISSIONER, CGST, GURU G RAM
. . . . Appellan t
Vs.
M/S BECHTEL INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED
. . . . Responden t
****
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY VASHISTH
Present M r. Suman Jain, Sr. Standing Co u nsel, CBIC with M s. Kiratbir Kaur , Advocate f or the applicant/appellant.
SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA, J.(Oral)
C ounsel for the appellant, upon i nstructions, states that he want s to withdraw t h e present appeal. Application N o.CM-18833-CII-2024 has als o been filed for withdrawal of the Appeal.
F or the reasons stated in the app l ication, the same is allowed. P resent Appeal i.e. STA-6-2024 i s dismissed as withdrawn. P ending application(s), if a n y, also stands disposed o f
accordingly.
(SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA) JUDGE
(SANJAY VASHISTH)
JUDGE
09.12.2024
Mohit goyal
1. Wheth e r speaking/reasoned? Yes/No 2. Wheth e r reportable? Yes/No
MOHIT GOYAL 2024.12.10 11:34 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER, CGST, GURU GRAM
M/S BECHTEL INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED
SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA
SANJAY VASHISTH
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
