A 2000 regular second appeal was listed for hearing but no counsel appeared for the appellants or either respondent despite notice. The High Court dismissed the appeal for non-prosecution, granting liberty to revive it if anything survived in the matter.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
221-1 RSA-3985-2000 (O&M) Date of Decision : 05.11.2024
Krishan Kumar and Another ....Appellants
VERSUS
Ved Parkash and Another
....Respondents
CORAM : HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE ALKA SARIN
Present : None.
ALKA SARIN, J. (Oral)
( ALKA SARIN )
05.11.2024 jk
JUDGE
NOTE: Whether speaking/non-speaking: Speaking Whether reportable: YES/NO
JITENDER KUMAR 2024.11.06 10:59 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh
Krishan Kumar
Ved Parkash
Alka Sarin
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
