The High Court dismissed the appeal for non-prosecution as the appellant had no representation and appeared uninterested in pursuing the matter.
The present appeal(s) dismissed for nonprosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA 220 AT CHANDIGARH
RSA-3950 of 1999(O&M) and RSA-3951 of 1999(O&M) Date of decision : August 20, 2024
Nishan Singh (Since deceased) through L.Rs
...... Appellant
Versus
Smt. Shibban and others
...... Respondents
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK GUPTA
Present : None for the appellant.
Mr. Inderjit Sharma, Advocate for respondent No.1.
*******
DEEPAK GUPTA, J (Oral)
that the appellant is not interested in pursuing the present appeal(s).
( DEEPAK GUPTA) JUDGE
August 20, 2024 archana Whether speaking/reasoned Yes Whether Reportable : No
ARCHANA ARORA 2024.08.21 11:52 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Nishan Singh (Since deceased) through L.Rs
Smt. Shibban
Deepak Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
