The appellant filed a relinquishment appeal after settling the matter with the respondent by paying rent. The single judge dismissed the appeal as withdrawn.
The appeal was dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
239-a IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
RSA-310-1999 (O&M) Date of Decision: December 05, 2024
Munish Chand alias Munish Kumar … Appellant
Versus
Municipal Commi�ee, Ladwa …Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK GUPTA
Present: - Mr. Rishipal Chaudhary, Advocate for the appellant.
DEEPAK GUPTA, J.(Oral)
Statement is made by learned counsel for the appellant that the ma�er has been se�led with respondent-Municipal Commi�ee, Ladwa, inasmuch as the appellant has paid the rent and respondent has allowed him to run the shop and therefore, appellant does not want to con!nue the present appeal.
In view of the aforesaid, present pe!!on is dismissed as
withdrawn.
December 05, 2024 (DEEPAK GUPTA) sarita JUDGE Whether reasoned/speaking: Yes/No Whether reportable: Yes/No
Sarita Rani 2024.12.05 06:27 I attest to the accuracy of this document/order
Munish Chand alias Munish Kumar
Municipal Committee, Ladwa
Deepak Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
