Second appeal against a co-operative society. Counsel for respondent No.1 reported the appellant's death and that the disputed amount had already been paid to the Society. The appeal was disposed of as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[232] IN THE HIGH COURT OF P UNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIG A RH
RSA-277 3 -1999(O&M) Date of D ecision : 20.08.2024
Santokh S ingh …Appellant ver s us
The Sing h wal Bambowal Co-operative A g ricultural Service Society Singhwal,Tehsil Mukeri a n, District Hoshiarp u r therough its President and ot h ers ….Respondents
Coram : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PANKAJ JAIN
Present: None for the appellant. Mr. Akhil Dadwal, Advocat e for respondent No.1.
PANKAJ JAIN, J. (ORAL)
[1] Mr. Akhil Dadwal, Advocat e , puts in appearance on behalf o f responde n t No.1 and has filed his power of attorney in Court today. Th e same is t a ken on record.
[2] Counsel for respondent No.1 submits that the appellant h a s died. H e has produced copy of deat h certificate of the appellant t o substanti a te the same. He further sub m its that the amount in dispute already s t ands paid to the respondent-Society.
[2] In view of the above, the present appeal is disposed of a s having b e en rendered infructuous.
(PANKAJ JAIN) JUDGE
20.08.20 2 4
‘R. Sharma'
Whether speaking/ reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No
RAJNEESH SHARMA 2024.08.22 22:33 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Santokh Singh
The Singhwal Bambowal Co-operative Agricultural Service Society Singhwal, Tehsil Mukerian, District Hoshiarpur through its President
Pankaj Jain
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
