Second appeal in a suit for possession of a demised shop, earlier decreed against defendants, was disposed of on consent: appellants to vacate by 28.02.2025, pay ₹7,500 monthly as user charges until then, escalating to ₹50,000 monthly if execution becomes necessary.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
131 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
RSA-2034-2024 (O&M) Date of Decision: September 02, 2024
Inderjit Singh and another … Appellants
Versus
Bachan Singh …Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK GUPTA
Present: - Mr. Manbir Singh Ba�h, Advocate for the appellants.
Mr. Ni�n Sachdeva, Advocate for the respondent-caveator.
DEEPAK GUPTA, J.(Oral)
This is the regular second appeal filed by the defendants.
Disposed of.
September 02, 2024 (DEEPAK GUPTA) sarita JUDGE Whether reasoned/speaking: Yes/No Whether reportable: Yes/No
Sarita Rani 2024.09.02 05:07 I attest to the accuracy of this document/order
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the second appeal could be disposed of on agreed terms for vacating the demised shop by 28.02.2025 with mesne profits of ₹7,500 per month.
Inderjit Singh and another
Bachan Singh
Deepak Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
