Dismissed
Nirmal Singh v. Satinder Singh
Punjab & Haryana HCRSA/1941/2000
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Disposed without reason; Appellants absent from hearing. Order dismissed for non-prosecution.
What the court decided
AI extract
Disposed without reason; Appellants absent from hearing. Order dismissed for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
221 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJ A B AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
RSA-1941-200 0 (O&M) Date of Decisio n : 04.11.2024
Nirmal Singh & another .…Appellant Versus Satinder Singh & others ….Respondent
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PANKAJ JAIN
Present: No n e.
PANKAJ JAIN, J. (ORAL)
N o ne has appeared on behalf of t h e appellants today. Same wa s the position on the last date. It seems that the appellants are not interested i n pursuing the pr e sent appeal.
Di s missed for non-prosecution.
| (PANKAJ JAIN) | |
|---|---|
| November 04, 2 024 |
JUDGE |
| ps | |
| Whether speaking/ reasoned | : Yes/No |
| Whether reportable | : Yes/No |
PUSHPINDER SAINI 2024.11.06 09:46 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Nirmal Singh & another
Satinder Singh & others
Pankaj Jain
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court