The appeal was dismissed as withdrawn by the appellant, arguing that the subject property had already been sold.
The appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
130 ����������������� IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
RSA-1618-1993 Date of decision : 05.04.2024
TEJA SINGH
....Appellant
Versus
PRITAM SINGH AND ANR ...Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PANKAJ JAIN
Present: Ms. Raina S. Thakur, Advocate for the appellant.
None for the respondents.
PANKAJ JAIN, J. (ORAL)
Counsel appearing for the appellant prays for withdrawal of the
instant appeal in view of the fact that the property in question aleady stands sold.
| April 05, 2024 | (Pankaj Jain) |
|---|---|
| Dpr | Judge |
| Whether speaking/reasoned | : Yes/No |
| Whether reportable | : Yes/No |
Deepak Kumar 2024.04.08 10:36 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Teja Singh
Pritam Singh and another
Pankaj Jain
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
