The Hry. State Coop. Supply and Marketin v. Amrish Chander Sharma and Anr.
Case brief
What is this about?
Appellant and counsel absent on two consecutive hearing dates; court records their lack of interest in pursuing the appeal.
Appellant and counsel absent on two consecutive hearing dates; court records their lack of interest in pursuing the appeal.
Order recording repeated absence of the appellant and counsel despite the case being called twice; no substantive matter decided.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Despite, the case having been called twice, there is no represent a tion on behalf of the appellan t . On the last date of hearing a lso there is n o representation on behalf of t h e appellant. It appears that nei t her the appel l ant nor his counsel is interested in pursuing the present appeal.
MOHIT 2024.11.19 12:08 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court