First appeal dismissed for non-prosecution due to the appellant's failure to appear despite service since 2020.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
206
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
RSA-1584-1993 (O&M) Date of decision : 21.12.2022
Jai Kishan ... Appellant(s) Versus Jag Bhushan Jain (deceased) through LRs and Another ... Respondent(s)
CORAM : HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ALKA SARIN
Present : None for the appellant.
Mr. Adarsh Jain, Advocate for the respondents.
ALKA SARIN, J. (ORAL)
None has been putting in appearance on behalf of the appellant since 2020 despite service. Today also no one has put in appearance on behalf of the appellant. It appears that the appellant is not interested in pursuing the present appeal. This Court is left with no other option but to dismiss the present appeal for non-prosecution.
Dismissed for non-prosecution.
( ALKA SARIN ) 21.12.2022 JUDGE Yogesh Sharma
NOTE: Whether speaking/non-speaking: Speaking Whether reportable: YES/NO
YOGESH SHARMA 2022.12.22 09:37 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment. Chandigarh
Jai Kishan
Jag Bhushan Jain (deceased) through LRs
Another
ALKA SARIN
Yogesh Sharma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
