Plaintiff's regular second appeal in a money recovery suit, pending 30 years, dismissed for non-prosecution as no one appeared on three consecutive dates.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[202] IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
RSA-1280-1994
Date of Decision : 01.08.2024
M/s Siri Venkateshwara Engineering Co., Phagwara …Appellant
versus
M/s Suraj Lal Kundal Lal and others ….Respondents
Coram : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PANKAJ JAIN
Present: None.
PANKAJ JAIN, J. (ORAL)
(PANKAJ JAIN) JUDGE
01.08.2024
Whether speaking/ reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No
RAJNEESH SHARMA 2024.08.04 22:55 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
M/s Siri Venkateshwara Engineering Co., Phagwara
M/s Suraj Lal Kundal Lal and others
Pankaj Jain
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
