Second appeal disposed of by reference to a detailed order of even date passed in a connected RSA; pending miscellaneous applications also disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
RSA-1085-1992 Reserved on: 09.02.2024 Date of decision: 02.05.2024
JAGDISH CHANDER AND ANR.
..Appellants
Versus
BHIM SAIN AND ORS.
..Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KSHETARPAL
Present: None for the appellants.
Mr. Mohit Garg, Advocate for respondent No.3.
ANIL KSHETARPAL, J.
RSA-865-1992, titled as “Parkash Dev (deceased) through LRs. Vs. Satish
Kumar and others” .
2 All the pending miscellaneous applications, if any, are also
disposed of.
May 02nd , 2024 (ANIL KSHETARPAL) Ay JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No
MOHD AYUB 2025.06.12 13:40 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment.
Jagdish Chander
Bhim Sain
Anil Kshetarpal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
