The single-judge bench dismissed the criminal appeal for want of prosecution due to the complete absence of the appellant's counsel on the hearing date, indicating the appellant was no longer interested in pursuing the matter.
The appeal was dismissed for want of prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
712
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
RSA-1000-2001 (O&M) Date of Decision: 05.12.2024
Hukum Singh
......Appellant(s)
Vs.
State of Haryana
......Respondent(s)
CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SUDEEPTI SHARMA
Present: None for the appellant.
Mr. Harish Nain, AAG, Haryana.
SUDEEPTI SHARMA.J. (ORAL)
December 05, 2024 (SUDEEPTI SHARMA) tripti JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned: Speaking Whether reportable: Yes / No
TRIPTI SAINI 2024.12.14 13:26 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Hukum Singh
State of Haryana
Sudeepti Sharma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
