Applicant sought review of a 04.04.2024 judgment dismissing his regular second appeal, alleging fraud and seeking to add documents. The court found no ground for review and dismissed the review application; pending applications were disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
121 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
RA-RS-32-2024 (O&M) in RSA-1039-1992 Date of Decision: September 19, 2024
Krishan (since deceased) through LRs and another
… Applicant/appellant No.2
Versus
Ramesh and others …Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK GUPTA
Present: - Mr. Shekhar Verma, Advocate for applicant-appellant No.2. DEEPAK GUPTA, J.(Oral)
Civil suit filed by the plain#ffs (respondents herein) for possession of suit land was decreed by the trial Court on 17.05.1990. Appeal filed by the defendants was dismissed by the First Appellate Court on 09.01.1992. The regular second appeal, i.e. RSA No.1039 of 1992 filed by the defendants against the concurrent findings of the Courts below, was dismissed by this Court vide a detailed judgment dated 04.04.2024 a3er hearing both the sides at length.
Dismissed.
The pending applica#on(s), if any, stand(s) disposed of.
September 19, 2024 (DEEPAK GUPTA) sarita JUDGE Whether reasoned/speaking: Yes/No Whether reportable: Yes/No
Sarita Rani 2024.09.19 05:39 I attest to the accuracy of this document/order
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the judgment dated 04.04.2024 in RSA No.1039-1992 should be reviewed on grounds of alleged fraud by the minor respondent and his mother?
Krishan (since deceased) through LRs
Ramesh
Deepak Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
