Review application seeking to raise fresh questions of law and arguments beyond the scope of review; the court held it was not fit to entertain the review and dismissed it.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
103
RA-CW-363-2024 in CWP-10571-2024
BMR ADVISORS LLP V/S THE INCOME TAX OFFICER AND ANR
Present: Mr. Vishal Kalra, Advocate for the review petitioner.
Mr. Varun Issar, Sr. Standing Counsel for the respondents.
Essentially, the review petitioner seeks to raise fresh question of
law and arguments which are beyond the scope of review.
In view of the limited scope of review, we do not find it a fit case
for entertaining the present review petition.
RA stands dismissed accordingly.
(SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA) JUDGE
(SANJAY VASHISTH) 13.09.2024 JUDGE
mohit goyal
MOHIT GOYAL 2024.09.18 11:55 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
BMR Advisors LLP
The Income Tax Officer
Anr.
Sanjeev Prakash Sharma
Sanjay Vashisth
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
