not at home. Thereafter the victim and the accused went ahead. PW-1 further testifies that in the evening, he heard about the missing of the victim. When the said witness went to inquire to the complainant, thereupon the complainant revealed that the victim was missing from the jhuggi, since morning, and, earlier to that the victim was seen in the company of girls T and R, playing near the jhuggi area. PW-1 further deposed that they all made search for the victim but could not locate her. On the next day i.e. on 12.11.2018, they received an information from the public regarding the dead body of the victim lying near Kushalsad Mandir area, whereupon he along with the complainant and a large number of persons from their locality, thus went to that place. The said witness also deposed that he saw the dead body of the victim lying near the vacant shop in a naked condition, besides noticed that several injury marks were present on her body, and, that blood was oozing from her private parts. PW-1 further testified that at that time he recollected that in the morning of the previous day, he had seen the victim in the company of the accused, and, thereupon he immediately shared the said information with the complainant. PW-1 has also identified the accused in Court, and, the said identification then made by the said witness of the accused in Court, remained unbelied. As such therebys the factum of the accused being known to the witness (supra) becomes cogently established, besides therebys, thus there was no necessity qua prior thereto any valid test identification parade being conducted, nor therebys the first time identification in Court of the accused by the witness (supra) suffers from any infirmity.
