The petitioner's tracing instrument was dismissed for non-prosecution as no steps were taken for file reconstruction following a fire incident that destroyed the registry file.
Tracing instrument (ITC) dismissed for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
208
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
(O&M) Date of Decision: 03.09.2024
. . . . Petitioner
Vs.
. . . . Respondent
****
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY VASHISTH
********
Present None.
SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA, J.(Oral)
(SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA) JUDGE
(SANJAY VASHISTH) JUDGE
September 03, 2024 Lavisha
1. Whether speaking/reasoned? Yes/No 2. Whether reportable? Yes/No
LAVISHA 2024.09.05 10:22 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment Punjab & Haryana High Court, Chandigarh
Petitioner
Respondent
Sanjeev Prakash Sharma
Sanjay Vashisth
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
