Order of even date in an income tax appellate matter, issued by reference to a detailed judgment in a companion appeal between the same parties.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
106-2
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
ITA-112-2024 (O&M) Date of Decision: 16.12.2024
PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOM E TAX, ROHTAK . . . . Appella n t Vs.
M/S DIN D A YAL PURUSHOTAM LAL
. . . . Responden t
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY VASHISTH
Present: Ms. Gauri Neo Rampal, Sr. Sta n ding Counsel (through VC) for the appellant/Revenue.
SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA, J.(Oral)
For order, see detailed judgme n t of even date passed in ITA110-2024 ti t led as PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, ROHTAK Versus M/S DIN DAYAL PURUSHOTAM LAL.
(SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA) JUDGE
(SANJAY VASHISTH) 16.12.2024 JUDGE mohit goyal
������������������������������ ������� ���������������������� ������
MOHIT GOYAL 2024.12.16 18:12 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, Rohtak
M/s Din Dayal Purushotam Lal
Sanjeev Prakash Sharma
Sanjay Vashisth
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
