The High Court disposed of an incomplete petition because the petitioner failed to address Registry objections within the statutory period and did not appear during listing. No further order was required.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
INCOMP case No. 4597 of 2024 -1-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH (145)
INCOMP case No. 4597 of 2024 Date of decision : 21.11.2024
Bhupinder Singh
................Petitioner
vs.
Resham Singh and another
.................Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH BHARDWAJ
Present: None
RAJESH BHARDWAJ, J. (Oral)
the office.
BANITA CHUGH 2024.11.22 11:19 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
INCOMP case No. 4597 of 2024 -2-
of the same nature is lying in the office as incomplete case and none has worried to take further recourse in the matter. The case has been shown in the urgent cause list and none has appeared for the petitioner, when it is called and taken up.
passed in the present case, which stands disposed of. File be consigned.
( RAJESH BHARDWAJ ) 21.11.2024 JUDGE chugh
Whether speaking / reasoned Yes / No Whether reportable Yes / No
BANITA CHUGH 2024.11.22 11:19 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Bhupinder Singh
Resham Singh
Rajesh Bhardwaj
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
